Free · 10 minutes · no card
The PTE score predictor that shows your strengths, your gaps, and what to fix.
Most predictors hand you a number from a black box. Ours gives you a predicted per-skill score, your readiness %, and exactly whyit landed there — so you know what to fix and whether you're ready to book. Based on AI scoring that mirrors the real PTE engine, updated for the August 2025 exam format.
How the PTE score predictor works
The predictor is built on a three-stage pipeline that mirrors how the real PTE AI scoring engine evaluates your test. Every stage is visible to you, not hidden behind a proprietary wall.
1. Sample across all 4 skills
A short set of real PTE tasks — speaking, writing, reading, listening — scored the way Pearson's engines score them. The diagnostic samples 12 to 16 tasks; a full mock covers 60+.
2. Benchmark against known outcomes
Your performance is benchmarked against thousands of attempts whose real PTE results we know. Statistical models map your task-level scores to the 10–90 PTE scale.
3. Show, don't hide
You see what's driving the number and how it sharpens as you practise. Per-skill breakdown, enabling skill detail, readiness %, and your three biggest score leaks — no black box.
For Speaking tasks, we use Azure Speech Services to transcribe your audio in real time and evaluate pronunciation confidence at the phoneme level. For Writing and content evaluation, Anthropic's Claude AI analyses your responses against the published PTE scoring rubrics. Reading and Listening tasks are scored deterministically against verified answer keys — exactly as the real exam does.
Why transparency matters
Most score predictors give you a number and nothing else. The problem is that a number alone doesn't help you improve. If your predicted Speaking score is 62, you need to know why — is it fluency? Pronunciation? Content? Our predictor shows the breakdown so you can fix the right thing. Compare predictors in the comparison table below.
What each predicted score range means
Your predicted score maps directly to the PTE 10–90 scale. Here's what each range tells you about your readiness and what it unlocks.
| Predicted range | Label | What it means | Readiness |
|---|---|---|---|
| 80 to 90 | Likely ready for 79+ | Your responses consistently hit advanced rubric markers across all four skills. Accuracy is high, fluency is smooth, and enabling skills are strong. | High — book with confidence |
| 70 to 79 | Borderline 79 | You are close to the top band but one or two skills are pulling the prediction down. Most often Speaking fluency or Writing discourse. | Moderate — fix the leaks first |
| 60 to 69 | On track for 65 | Solid intermediate performance. You meet Proficient-level requirements for most skills but may dip below on one or two. | Good for 65, needs work for 79 |
| 50 to 59 | Building towards Competent | You meet baseline Competent English in some skills but not all four. Listening and Reading tend to be stronger; Speaking or Writing usually needs the most improvement. | Moderate for 50, early for 65 |
| Below 50 | Foundation stage | Several skills are below the Competent cut score. The prediction will tell you exactly where to focus your preparation time. | Not yet — use the gap analysis |
Remember: the prediction is per-skill, not just an overall average. For Australia PR, you need to meet the cut score in every skill individually. A predicted overall of 72 is misleading if your Writing is at 55. The predictor flags this clearly.
How accurate is the prediction?
Accuracy depends on how many tasks the predictor has seen from you. More data means a tighter confidence interval. The table below shows typical accuracy at each stage, validated against test-takers who shared their real PTE results with us.
| Scenario | Tasks seen | Accuracy | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full 10-minute diagnostic | 12 to 16 sampled tasks | Within 3 to 5 points of real PTE | Enough coverage across all four skills to produce a reliable per-skill breakdown |
| After 1 full mock test | 60+ tasks | Within 2 to 3 points | Comparable to Pearson's own practice test scoring, plus gap analysis |
| After 3+ mock tests | 180+ tasks | Within 1 to 2 points | The predictor has seen enough of your patterns to be highly confident |
| Single skill only (e.g. Speaking) | 4 to 6 tasks | Within 5 to 8 points for that skill | Useful for quick checks, but less precise than a full cross-skill sample |
These margins are comparable to the accuracy of Pearson's own practice test. The key difference is that we return results in under 5 seconds instead of 24–48 hours, and show you what drove the number. Read more about how accurate PTE mock tests are and why mock test scores differ from real PTE.
Important caveat
No predictor — ours included — replaces the official PTE test. Predicted scores are estimates, not guarantees. Test-day factors like anxiety, room noise, and fatigue affect your real performance. We recommend treating the prediction as a reliable benchmark to guide preparation, not as a promise of your final score.
Task weights: which tasks affect your score most
Not all PTE tasks carry equal weight. Repeat Sentence and Write From Dictation are the biggest swing factors for most test-takers. The predictor accounts for these weights when computing your per-skill predictions.
| Task type | Skills affected | Scoring weight |
|---|---|---|
| Read Aloud | Reading + Speaking | High — affects both communicative and enabling scores |
| Repeat Sentence | Listening + Speaking | Very high — single biggest swing factor for most test-takers |
| Describe Image | Speaking | Medium — fluency and vocabulary matter most |
| Retell Lecture | Listening + Speaking | High — tests comprehension and oral delivery together |
| Summarise Written Text | Reading + Writing | Medium — grammar and content accuracy dominate |
| Write Essay | Writing | Medium — structure, grammar, vocabulary, and spelling all score |
| Multiple-choice (Reading) | Reading | Low per item — but many items add up |
| Re-order Paragraphs | Reading | Medium — full marks or zero, no partial credit |
| Fill in the Blanks (R&W) | Reading + Writing | Medium — vocabulary and collocations tested |
| Fill in the Blanks (Reading) | Reading | Medium — contextual vocabulary |
| Summarise Spoken Text | Listening + Writing | Medium — writing quality affects both skills |
| Write From Dictation | Listening + Writing | Very high — one of the biggest point sources in the entire test |
| Highlight Correct Summary | Listening + Reading | Low per item — comprehension accuracy |
| Multiple-choice (Listening) | Listening | Low per item |
| Select Missing Word | Listening | Low |
| Highlight Incorrect Words | Listening + Reading | Medium — penalised for wrong clicks |
This is why two students with the same “overall ability” can get very different scores: the one who nails Repeat Sentence and Write From Dictation pulls ahead by 5 to 10 points. If you're stuck at 65 or stuck at 72, check these high-weight tasks first.
How enabling skills affect your predicted score
The PTE doesn't just score your answers for content — it also measures six “enabling skills” that feed into your communicative scores behind the scenes. Many test-takers lose points here without realising it. The predictor measures each one and shows you where you're leaking.
| Enabling skill | Affects | How it's measured |
|---|---|---|
| Oral fluency | Speaking score | Smooth delivery without hesitation, false starts, or unnatural pauses. The predictor measures pause frequency and length. |
| Pronunciation | Speaking score | Native-like vowel quality, stress patterns, and intonation. Scored via Azure Speech transcription accuracy and phoneme confidence. |
| Grammar | Writing + Speaking | Correct sentence structure, tense usage, and agreement. The predictor catches subject-verb errors, tense shifts, and fragment sentences. |
| Vocabulary | Writing + Speaking | Range and precision of word choice. Academic collocations and topic-specific terms score higher than generic words. |
| Spelling | Writing score | Every misspelling in essay and summary tasks costs points. The predictor flags your most frequent spelling errors. |
| Written discourse | Writing score | Logical flow, paragraph structure, cohesive devices, and introduction/conclusion quality. The predictor evaluates coherence at the paragraph level. |
If your predicted Speaking score is lower than expected, check the enabling-skill breakdown first. Oral fluency and pronunciation are the most common culprits. For Writing, it's usually grammar and written discourse. Read our speaking practice guide for drills that target these traits.
Gap analysis: your three biggest score leaks
After every diagnostic or mock test, the predictor runs a gap analysis that identifies your three biggest score leaks — the specific task types and enabling skills where fixing your performance would have the largest impact on your predicted score.
Leak identified
The analysis pinpoints which task type or enabling skill is costing you the most points. For example: 'Repeat Sentence accuracy is 45 %, pulling your Listening and Speaking predictions down by 6 points each.'
Impact quantified
Each leak comes with an estimated point impact. You see exactly how many points you would gain by fixing it, so you can prioritise the highest-value practice.
Fix plan provided
Each leak links to the specific practice module or strategy guide that addresses it. No guesswork — just a direct path from diagnosis to drill.
The gap analysis is what turns a prediction into a plan. Without it, you know your number but not what to do about it. This is a core difference between our predictor and tools like ApeUni or Pearson's practice test — see the comparison table. For strategy guides by target score, see PTE 65 strategy, PTE 79 strategy, or PTE 90 strategy.
Worked example: from prediction to plan
Here's a concrete example of how the predictor turns a 10-minute diagnostic into an actionable study plan.
Scenario: aiming for Australia Proficient English (10 PR points)
A test-taker completes the free diagnostic. The predictor returns the following per-skill predictions:
Overall prediction: 65 — Readiness for Proficient: 28 %
Top 3 leaks identified
- Writing — essay grammar and discourse (est. +8 points). Frequent subject-verb agreement errors and weak paragraph transitions. Fix: focus on writing section practice, specifically essay structure drills.
- Speaking — oral fluency (est. +4 points). Too many mid-sentence pauses and self-corrections in Describe Image and Retell Lecture. Fix: daily Describe Image practice with a timer.
- Writing — spelling (est. +3 points). Consistent misspellings of common academic words. Fix: learn the PTE vocabulary list with spelling focus.
Recommended next step: take a full mock test after 2 weeks of targeted practice to see the prediction sharpen. With the leaks fixed, the model projects a Writing improvement to around 66–70 and Speaking to 75–78, which would bring Proficient readiness above 70 %.
PTE score ranges: quick reference
Use this table to understand what each predicted score range maps to across different frameworks. For the full chart with per-skill breakdowns, see the PTE score chart. To convert a specific score, use the score calculator.
| PTE range | CEFR | IELTS (approx) | Australia PR level |
|---|---|---|---|
| 85 to 90 | C2 | 8.5 to 9.0 | Superior (20 points) |
| 79 to 84 | C1 | 8.0 | Superior (20 points) |
| 65 to 78 | B2 to C1 | 7.0 to 7.5 | Proficient (10 points) |
| 50 to 64 | B1 to B2 | 6.0 to 6.5 | Competent (0 points) |
| 36 to 49 | A2 to B1 | 4.5 to 5.5 | Below Competent |
| 10 to 35 | A1 to A2 | Below 4.5 | Below Competent |
Australia PR cut scores are for tests on or after 7 August 2025. The per-skill thresholds differ from the old uniform 50 / 65 / 79 rule. See the Australia PR guide for the full per-skill breakdown.
PTE Mocks predictor vs other tools
How does our predictor compare to other PTE scoring tools? Here's a feature-by-feature breakdown against ApeUni and Pearson's official practice test.
| Feature | PTE Mocks | ApeUni | Pearson Practice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Per-skill breakdown | Yes — Speaking, Writing, Reading, Listening | Overall only (free tier) | Yes — included |
| Enabling skill detail | Yes — fluency, pronunciation, grammar, vocab, spelling, discourse | No | Limited |
| Methodology shown | Yes — you see what drives the number | No — black box | No — proprietary |
| Gap analysis | Yes — your 3 biggest leaks with fix plan | No | No |
| Readiness percentage | Yes — probability of hitting your target | No | No |
| Cost | Free (10-min diagnostic), included in mock tests | Free basic, paid for detail | Paid per test |
| AI scoring for Speaking | Yes — Azure Speech + Claude AI | Yes — proprietary | Yes — Pearson engine |
| AI scoring for Writing | Yes — Claude AI against PTE rubrics | Yes — proprietary | Yes — Pearson engine |
| Turnaround time | Under 5 seconds | Instant (basic), slow (detailed) | 24 to 48 hours |
| Australia per-skill cut scores | Yes — August 2025 format | Not yet updated | N/A |
For a broader comparison of PTE preparation platforms, see our best PTE platform guide. For the difference between PTE Academic and PTE Core, see PTE Core vs PTE Academic.
Tips to improve your predicted score
Your predicted score is a benchmark, not a ceiling. Here are the highest-impact strategies to move it upward, ordered by typical point gain.
Nail Repeat Sentence and Write From Dictation first
These two task types contribute the most to your Listening, Speaking and Writing scores combined. Most students who jump from 65 to 79 do so by perfecting these tasks. Practice daily with our Repeat Sentence drills and Write From Dictation practice.
Fix your enabling skills before retesting
If the predictor flags oral fluency, pronunciation, grammar or spelling as a leak, these are multipliers — they affect your communicative scores across multiple tasks. One week of focused fluency drills can move your Speaking prediction by 5+ points. See our speaking practice guide.
Take mock tests under real conditions
Sit the full 2-hour test in one go, in a quiet room, without pausing. Your predicted score will be more realistic when it reflects test-day stamina, not cherry-picked practice sessions. Read exam day tips for the full routine.
Retest every 1 to 2 weeks
Don't wait until you feel “ready” — take a quick diagnostic or free mock test every week or two. Watching your prediction trend upward is motivating and lets you catch regressions early.
Use the most-repeated questions list
PTE has a pool of frequently repeated questions. Practising these gives you a familiarity advantage on test day, especially for Read Aloud, Repeat Sentence and Write From Dictation.
Don't ignore your strong skills
It's tempting to focus only on weaknesses, but for Australia PR you need every skill above the cut score. Maintain your strong skills with regular practice while you drill the weak ones. If you're not improving, check whether you're neglecting any skill.
When to book the real PTE
Book when your readiness percentage is consistently above 75 % across at least two mock tests taken a week apart. This accounts for day-to-day variance and gives you confidence that your prediction reflects stable performance. For study planning, see how long to prepare for PTE and how many mock tests before PTE.
Related tools & guides
PTE score chart
Full PTE to IELTS, CEFR and PR points reference
Score calculator
Interactive sliders to convert PTE to IELTS and check PR points
PTE AI scoring explained
How Pearson's AI scores PTE and how PTE Mocks replicates it
Australia PR score requirements
Per-skill cut scores for Competent, Proficient and Superior
PTE 79+ strategy
Task-by-task strategy to clear the top migration band
PTE 65 strategy
How to break into the Proficient range
How accurate are PTE mock tests?
What determines mock test accuracy and how to interpret scores
Why mock scores differ from real PTE
The gap between practice and real test — and how to close it
Frequently asked questions
It's accurate within 3 to 5 points after a 10-minute diagnostic, and within 1 to 2 points after three full mock tests. The prediction sharpens with every question, benchmarking your performance against thousands of attempts with known PTE outcomes. See the accuracy table for details.
Yes. The 10-minute diagnostic that produces your predicted score is free and needs no card. You get per-skill predictions, a readiness percentage, and your three biggest score leaks.
Both. You get predicted Speaking, Writing, Reading and Listening scores — which matters because Australia's rules are per-skill — plus the overall and readiness %. Use the score calculator to see what your predicted scores mean for migration points.
We show how the number is computed and what's driving it. ApeUni gives a number from a black box. Knowing why your score is where it is — which enabling skills are leaking, which task types cost you the most — is the whole point. See the comparison table for a feature-by-feature breakdown.
It's the probability that you would hit your target score if you sat the real PTE today, based on your task-by-task performance — not just averages. If your readiness is below 70 %, check the gap analysis section to see what to fix first.
Yes. After you complete the diagnostic or a mock test, it checks each skill prediction against the August 2025 per-skill cut scores for Competent, Proficient and Superior English, and tells you exactly which skills need more work.
It's fully updated for the August 2025 format, including the new Personal Introduction and Email tasks. The scoring models and per-skill cut scores reflect the current exam structure. Read more about the differences between PTE Core and Academic.
Your prediction reflects your actual performance on the tasks you completed. If you tried harder tasks or had an off day, the number moves. Over multiple tests, the trend matters more than any single prediction. That's why we recommend taking at least three mocks before booking.
Enabling skills are six traits — oral fluency, pronunciation, grammar, vocabulary, spelling, and written discourse — that feed into your communicative scores behind the scenes. A student with perfect content but poor fluency will lose points on Speaking. See the enabling skills section for details on how each one is measured.
Currently it's calibrated for PTE Academic. PTE Core for Canadian immigration uses a different scoring model that maps to CLB levels. We plan to add PTE Core prediction in a future update.
The 10-minute diagnostic samples 12 to 16 tasks across all four skills — enough for a useful first prediction. A full mock test (60+ tasks) gives a sharper result. Three tests make the predictor highly confident. Read our guide on how accurate PTE mock tests are.
Yes. The gap analysis breaks down performance by task type — Repeat Sentence, Write From Dictation, Read Aloud, etc. — and ranks them by impact on your score, so you know exactly where to focus practice.
No. We use Azure Speech Services for transcription and Anthropic's Claude AI for content and writing evaluation. The scoring rubrics are modelled on Pearson's published criteria, but we never claim official Pearson results. Read more about how PTE AI scoring works.
Use the gap analysis to identify your three biggest score leaks. Then practise those task types using our free practice modules. Retake the diagnostic or a mock test every 1 to 2 weeks to track improvement. Read how long to prepare for PTE for a study timeline.
Pearson's test uses their proprietary engine and takes 24–48 hours. Our predictor returns results in under 5 seconds, shows what drives the score, and gives a concrete fix plan. Both are calibrated to the PTE scale. See the full comparison table.
The diagnostic and mock tests work on desktop browsers with a microphone. Speaking tasks require audio recording, which is best done on a laptop or desktop in a quiet environment for accurate results.