PTE template · Framework

PTE Re-order Paragraphs Template: the topic-sentence method for full marks

Re-order Paragraphs shows you 4 or 5 short paragraphs in scrambled order and asks you to drag them into the correct logical sequence. There are 2 to 3 items per PTE Academic test, each drawn from a passage of up to 150 words total. The task is Reading only, partial credit, no negative marking, and AI-only scored. Partial credit is calculated from adjacent pairs – every consecutive pair in your submitted order that matches the source scores 1 point. This means you can score decently even if you miss the full sequence, as long as you get the local ordering right.

Take a free scored mock →All PTE templates

Quick answer

The Re-order Paragraphs template is a 3-anchor method: (1) find the paragraph that reads like a standalone introduction (no back-references), lock it as first; (2) chain the middle paragraphs using transition words and pronoun-antecedent links; (3) find the paragraph with a concluding move (recommendation, implication, summary word like 'therefore' or 'ultimately'), lock it as last. Then drag once – do not second-guess.

Read this first

Re-order Paragraphs is not a memorisation task. There is no fixed template answer, because the paragraphs change every item. What you can standardise is the DIAGNOSTIC ROUTINE – the 4 things you look for in every paragraph to decide where it fits. The framework below is a checklist for that routine, not a stock ordering.

The framework

How the framework works

Read the sections in order. Each one is a step of the framework, with adaptable sentence starters you fill from the actual prompt.

The 3-anchor framework

Every Re-order Paragraphs item has three anchor positions: 1. THE OPENER. Reads standalone. Introduces a topic, names an entity in full (not a pronoun), gives background context. If a paragraph starts with 'The [topic]', 'A recent study', 'Since [year]' – it is the opener candidate. 2. THE CHAIN (middle 2 or 3 paragraphs). Ordered by transitions: 'However', 'This', 'These findings', 'In response', 'For example'. Each middle paragraph must plausibly follow the previous one AND lead into the next. 3. THE CLOSER. Delivers a conclusion, recommendation, or implication. Uses words like 'Therefore', 'Ultimately', 'This suggests', 'The result is'. Often abstract or forward-looking. Anchor the opener first, then the closer, then chain the middle. This locks 2 of the 4 or 5 positions immediately.

The 4-signal diagnostic (apply to every paragraph)

For each paragraph, note four things: 1. TRANSITION WORDS. 'However', 'For example', 'In contrast', 'As a result', 'Furthermore' all signal a paragraph that MUST come after another paragraph. Rule out as opener. 2. PRONOUNS WITH NO ANTECEDENT IN THIS PARAGRAPH. If a paragraph starts with 'This trend', 'These findings', 'Such results', 'He argued', 'She proposed' – the antecedent lives in a PREVIOUS paragraph. Cannot be opener. 3. NAMED ENTITIES vs REFERRING EXPRESSIONS. A paragraph that introduces a person by full name ('Dr Susan Kim, a marine biologist,') tends to come before the one that refers to them just as 'Kim' or 'she'. 4. CONCLUDING MARKERS. 'Ultimately', 'Therefore', 'In summary', 'This suggests that', 'The evidence points to' – these are closers. Rule out as opener or early-middle.

The 5-step method (aim for under 90 seconds per item)

1. READ all paragraphs once at normal speed (15 to 20 seconds). Do not try to order yet – just build a mental map of the topic. 2. TAG each paragraph with a one-letter code for its position: O (opener), M (middle), C (closer). At this stage you may have two candidates for opener – that is fine. 3. LOCK the opener. The paragraph with the fullest topic introduction and no back-references wins. If two candidates tie, pick the one whose next-logical-idea most cleanly matches the START of another paragraph. 4. LOCK the closer. The paragraph with the strongest concluding marker or forward-looking statement wins. 5. CHAIN the middle by transition words and pronoun links. Read your candidate order aloud in your head – does each paragraph flow into the next? If yes, submit.

What Pearson scores on Re-order Paragraphs

One trait, partial credit, no negative marking: - Every pair of paragraphs that appears consecutively in your submitted order AND consecutively in the source passage scores 1 point. - A 4-paragraph item has 3 possible correct pairs (positions 1-2, 2-3, 3-4). A 5-paragraph item has 4 possible pairs. - Getting the whole sequence right = maximum. Getting the middle wrong but the first-two pair and last-two pair right still scores 2 out of 3 or 2 out of 4. This is why the 3-anchor framework works: locking the opener and closer often earns 2 of 3 (or 2 of 4) pair-credits even if the middle is scrambled.

The most common mistakes

- Trying to order by 'which paragraph sounds most interesting to start'. Interest is not a signal. Standalone context is the signal. - Ignoring pronouns. 'This' at the start of a paragraph is the strongest single indicator that the paragraph cannot be first. - Over-thinking the middle. Chain by transitions and pronouns, then move on. Second-guessing costs time and rarely improves the answer. - Not reading all paragraphs before starting to drag. You need the full topic map before deciding on the opener. - Spending more than 2 minutes on one item. Re-order is meant to be a quick 60 to 90 second item; if you are stuck, submit your best guess and move on. Reading has only 22 to 30 minutes total across 5 task types.

Timing targets

- 0 to 20 seconds: read all paragraphs once at normal speed. - 20 to 45 seconds: tag each paragraph O / M / C, lock the opener and closer. - 45 to 75 seconds: chain the middle by transitions and pronoun-antecedent links. - 75 to 90 seconds: read the full ordering silently, submit. - Over 120 seconds: hard stop. Submit your best guess and move on to the next item.

Worked examples

The framework applied

Same framework, different prompts. Each answer is filled with real content, not a memorised script.

Example 1Paragraph A: 'Australian coffee culture emerged in the 1950s when Italian and Greek migrants opened cafes in Sydney and Melbourne, introducing espresso machines that had been unfamiliar to the tea-drinking Anglo-Australian population.' Paragraph B: 'These early cafes eventually gave rise to the flat white, an Australian and New Zealand invention that has now spread to speciality coffee shops in London, New York and Tokyo.' Paragraph C: 'By the 1980s, second-generation cafe owners had built on their parents' European tradition and developed a distinctive local style, using lighter roasts and milk-forward preparations that suited Australian palates.' Paragraph D: 'This local style diverged sharply from the darker, more bitter Italian espresso tradition, and by the 2000s Melbourne had established a reputation as one of the world's most demanding coffee cities.'

4 paragraphs (approximately 120 words total) about the evolution of Australian coffee culture, source order A-B-C-D. Shuffled on screen as C, A, D, B.

Framework-filled answer

Correct order: A, C, D, B. Diagnostic: - A is the opener. It names 'Australian coffee culture' in full, uses a date ('1950s'), introduces the migrant cafe origin. No back-references. - C follows A. It uses 'their parents' European tradition' – the antecedent is the migrants introduced in A. Also chronologically 'By the 1980s' comes after '1950s'. - D follows C. 'This local style' picks up 'a distinctive local style' from C's last sentence. Chronology continues into 2000s. - B closes. 'These early cafes' back-references A/C, and B jumps forward to the global spread – a forward-looking closer. Pair credit: 3 out of 3 (A-C, C-D, D-B all match). Full marks.

Why this scores: The diagnostic here rests on two chains: chronology (1950s to 1980s to 2000s to global spread) and pronoun-antecedent ('their parents' in C, 'This local style' in D, 'These early cafes' in B). If you had put B second instead of last, C would still follow A and you would still score 1 pair-credit.

Example 2Paragraph A: 'The domestication of the horse marked one of the most consequential events in human history, transforming trade, warfare and communication across three continents.' Paragraph B: 'Archaeological evidence from the Botai culture of what is now Kazakhstan places the earliest confirmed horse domestication at around 3500 BCE, based on milk-residue analysis and characteristic wear patterns on horse teeth.' Paragraph C: 'From these steppe origins, horse-based technologies spread rapidly, first into the Bronze Age societies of the Middle East and later into the settled agricultural civilisations of China and the Mediterranean.' Paragraph D: 'Prior to the Botai discoveries, most researchers had assumed a later domestication timeline, and Kazakhstan itself had been considered peripheral to the story of Old World animal husbandry.' Paragraph E: 'By the classical period, horse-drawn chariots and cavalry had become the decisive military technology in every literate civilisation from Persia to Han China, and the pace of overland communication had roughly quadrupled.'

5 paragraphs (approximately 140 words) about the domestication of the horse, source order A-B-C-D-E. Shuffled on screen as B, D, A, C, E.

Framework-filled answer

Correct order: A, B, D, C, E. Diagnostic: - A is the opener. It introduces 'the domestication of the horse' in full and states the theme (consequential event). No back-references. No transition words. - B follows A. It provides the specific evidence ('Archaeological evidence... at around 3500 BCE') for A's claim. - D follows B. 'Prior to the Botai discoveries' back-references B directly (Botai was named in B). Adds historiographical context. - C follows D. 'From these steppe origins' back-references B's Kazakhstan setting. Moves outward geographically. - E closes. 'By the classical period' is a temporal jump forward, 'the decisive military technology' delivers the consequence promised in A. Pair credit: 4 out of 4. Full marks.

Why this scores: The two hardest calls are D vs C for position 3, and E vs C for closer. D wins position 3 because 'Prior to' is a stronger back-reference to B than 'From these steppe origins' is (D specifically names Botai, C only implies it). E wins closer because it delivers the payoff promised in A's opening sentence – that is what a closer does.

Frequently asked questions

What is the best Re-order Paragraphs strategy?

The 3-anchor method: lock the opener (standalone paragraph, no back-references, full topic introduction) first, lock the closer (concluding marker or forward-looking statement) second, then chain the middle by transition words and pronoun-antecedent links. This earns pair-credit even if the middle is imperfect.

How is Re-order Paragraphs scored?

Partial credit, no negative marking. Every pair of paragraphs that is consecutive in your submitted order AND consecutive in the source passage scores 1 point. A 4-paragraph item has 3 possible pair-credits; a 5-paragraph item has 4. There is no penalty for wrong order.

How many Re-order Paragraphs items are on the PTE exam?

2 to 3 items per PTE Academic test per Pearson's July 2025 Score Guide, each drawn from a source passage of up to 150 words. It sits in Part 2 (Reading), alongside the two Fill in the Blanks types, Multiple Choice items, and Reading and Writing Fill in the Blanks.

How much time should I spend on each Re-order Paragraphs item?

60 to 90 seconds per item is the target. The full Reading section is 22 to 30 minutes total across 5 task types, so you cannot afford to spend more than about 2 minutes on any single item. If you are stuck at the 2-minute mark, submit your best guess and move on.

What is the biggest signal that a paragraph cannot be first?

A pronoun with no antecedent inside the paragraph itself. 'This trend', 'These findings', 'Such results', 'He argued', 'It has been shown' at the start of a paragraph all mean the paragraph refers back to something in a PREVIOUS paragraph, so it cannot be the opener. Transition words like 'However', 'For example', 'In contrast' are the second-strongest signal.

Does Re-order Paragraphs have negative marking?

No. Only three PTE tasks have negative marking: Reading Multiple Choice Multiple Answers, Listening Multiple Choice Multiple Answers, and Highlight Incorrect Words. Re-order Paragraphs is partial credit with a floor of zero – a wrong order costs you the pair-credit but does not subtract from your total.